Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Nov 13, 2015

Congress Approves Two-Year Budget Framework

Congress Approves Two-Year Budget Framework

Last month, President Obama and Congress agreed to a two-year budget. The budget increases Federal discretionary spending by $80 billion over the two year period, which will be equally divided between defense and domestic programs. The agreement also suspends the debt ceiling through March 2017.

The budget agreement only establishes spending levels. Congress must still approve an omnibus bill to authorize spending for the next two years. The omnibus bill must be signed into law by December 11, 2015 in order to prevent a government shutdown.

A two-year budget greatly enhances the ability for Federal awarding agencies to develop long-term plans. Instead of preparing contingency plans for a government shutdown, agency personnel can devote additional resources into administering Federal programs.

The budget agreement is consequential for the grants community. Federal awarding agencies will know the extent of available funding for grant programs well in advance of grant competitions. This will enable agencies to begin the pre-award phase for grants programs earlier than in past years.

The two-year budget also removes some uncertainties for grant recipients. Recipients with continuing awards will have a better grasp of how much funding might be available in future years, which should make budgeting and program planning easier. Additionally, after years of sequestration, increased funding for grant programs will improve success rates for applicants.

The budget agreement has renewed discussions for adopting a two-year budget cycle for the Federal government. Senator Mike Enzi (R-WY) has introduced bipartisan legislation that would create a biennial budget cycle for Federal domestic spending. However, even with this year’s agreement, Congressional approval of the legislation seems remote. In a recent interview with Federal News Radio, Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA), a co-sponsor of the legislation, indicated that convincing members of Congress to change the budget cycle is a challenge.

1 Comment

  1. I wonder why the People don’t get fed up enough to replace the people who hinder the progress of international and domestic programs. If you look at the makeup of the Congress, most have been in place for decades, getting re-elected over and over and over again with similar results every year. Maybe if they knew that the People were serious about their representation and would quickly vote people out who are dis-satisfactory, they might do more. Among many of my friends and colleagues, there is much disdain, dismay about the Congress. I’m supposing the people who keep voting them back in are happy and the ones who are unhappy don’t care enough about it to vote.

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>